Google sues OTCAI “click a button” app Ponzi scammers


Google has filed a RICO lawsuit in opposition to two Chinese language scammers it alleges are behind the OTCAI “click on a button” app Ponzi.

Named defendants in Google’s filed April 4th Criticism are:

  1. Yunfeng Solar (aka Alphonse Solar), an app developer believed to reside in Shenzhen, China
  2. Hongnam Cheung (aka Zhang Hongnim, Stanford Fischer), an app developer believed to reside in Hong Kong, China

As alleged by Google, Solar and Cheung

have engaged in a persistent, persevering with scheme to defraud customers, regardless of Google’s efforts to fight the scheme to guard customers on its platforms by investigating and suspending offending fraudulent apps that Defendants uploaded to Google
Play.

The apps in query are of the “click on a button” Ponzi selection, of which BehindMLM has documented effectively over 100.

Regardless of their efforts to remain on prime of Solar’s and Cheung’s scamming via Google Play, Google Workspace, Gmail, Google Voice and YouTube, Google claims they

have continued in importing new apps to Google Play, utilizing various pc community infrastructure and accounts to obfuscate their identities, and making materials misrepresentations to Google within the course of.

Since 2019, Solar and Cheung are alleged to have uploaded eighty-seven apps to Google Play.

Whereas Defendants different their method from app to app, the means and strategies have been considerably related.

Particular “click on a button” app Ponzis cited by Google embody TionRT, Starlight Challenge, SkypeWallet and OTCAI.

OTCAI launched in April 2022. It was your typical tether (USDT) “click on a button” app Ponzi, representing customers click on a button correlated with fictional buying and selling.

Google cites BehindMLM’s protection of OTCAI’s collapse in June 2022 of their Criticism.

By way of these scams and Xiangying, Inc a shell firm registered in New York, Google alleges Solar and Cheung have defrauded round 100,000 customers. Google claims ~8700 of defrauded customers are US residents.

Solar’s and Cheung’s scamming came about via human trafficked slaves posing as mates of potential romantic companions;

Defendants or their brokers would ship textual content messages utilizing Google Voice to potential victims, primarily within the United
States and Canada.

The messages have been designed to persuade the focused victims that they have been despatched to the improper quantity (for instance, “I’m Sophia, do you keep in mind me?” or “I miss you on a regular basis, how are your mother and father Mike?”).

If focused victims responded (for instance, by telling the senders that they should be sending messages to the improper quantity), Defendants or their brokers would attempt to strike up a dialog and after exchanging preliminary messages with the victims, shift the conversations to different messaging platforms reminiscent of WhatsApp.

Defendants or their brokers would then try and develop a “friendship” or “romantic relationship” and in the end attempt to persuade the victims to obtain and make investments via one in all their apps.

The “pal” or “romantic companion” would provide to information the sufferer via the funding course of, typically reassuring the sufferer of any doubts that they had concerning the apps, however then disappear as soon as the sufferer tried to withdraw funds.

On-line movies;

Defendants or their brokers created on-line movies, together with on YouTube, selling the fraudulent funding apps.

The movies have been designed to persuade potential traders that the funding platforms and cryptocurrency have been official, secure, and efficient by offering details about the historical past of the funding platforms and the cryptocurrency, reminiscent of
introducing viewers to the “management groups” (which, on data and perception, have been in truth paid actors).

The movies would promise excessive charges of return, for instance, two % each day funding return.

And MLM compensation plans;

Defendants or their brokers lured victims utilizing in-person and on-line advertising and marketing applications that satisfied customers to develop into
“associates” of the apps on the promise that they’d earn fee by signing up further customers.

By way of these affiliate applications, Defendants marketed their apps on social media as a assured and simple solution to earn cash.

Google additional alleges Solar’s and Cheung’s unlawful conduct

has induced substantial monetary losses to Google customers. In accordance with person complaints, monetary losses seem to vary from 100 to tens of hundreds of {dollars} per particular person sufferer.

Defendants have additionally induced substantial hurt to Google.

Defendants’ scheme has induced Google to expend substantial assets to detect, deter, and disrupt Defendants’ actions and thereby defend Google customers and Google’s services.

Through the use of different Google merchandise to help their scheme, Defendants additionally threaten the security and integrity of these different merchandise, together with YouTube, Workspace, and Google Voice.

Defendant’s scheme has thus impaired Google customers’ confidence and belief in Google, its providers, and its platforms.

Throughout six claims of aid, Google has sued Solar and Cheung for;

  1. violations of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), particularly racketeering, wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud;
  2. breach of contract, Google Play app TOS;
  3. breach of contract, Google’s Developer Program Insurance policies;
  4. breach of contract, Google’s TOS
  5. breach of contract, YouTube Group Tips
  6. breach of contract, Google Voice Acceptable Use Coverage

Google maintains it

is dedicated to making sure the integrity of Google Play.

Upon discovering fraudulent habits, together with however not restricted to, discovery via diligent investigation of sufferer complaints, Google suspends and shuts down fraudulent apps and different Google infrastructure related to the Fraud Scheme (for instance, Workspaces, Google Voice numbers) primarily based on violations of the Developer Settlement or the Google Phrases of Service.

Keep tuned for updates as BehindMLM continues to trace Google’s case.