The Success by Health Receiver’s Tenth report reveals the Receivership is insolvent As of July 31st, 2022, the SBH Receivership has $1.85 million in liabilities. The problem is there’s only $15,548 left in the bank. As noted in the Receiver’s Ninth Report, the Receivership Estate remains insolvent. As noted previously, the Receivership Entities owe more […]
Success by Health Receivership insolvent, funds running out Read More »
The FTC’s Success by Health and NetForce cases have been consolidated as per a July 26th order. A January 2023 trial date has also been scheduled. Although Success by Health and NetForce are two separate companies, they are linked through defendant Jay Noland. Citing scamming dating back to the 1990s, the FTC filed suit against
FTC’s Success by Health & NetForce cases merged, trial set Read More »
The FTC claims the Supreme Court’s AMG decision has cost consumer a staggering $1.5 billion. The losses were realized through various fraudulent schemes, with the AMG decision leaving the FTC unable to effectively hold scammers accountable. If you’re unaware of the Supreme Court’s AMG decision or need a refresh, in a nutshell the FTC went
SC’s AMG decision has cost consumers over $1.5 billion Read More »
The FTC has been denied NetForce contempt sanctions against Jay Noland. The request for sanctions stems from Noland allegedly violating his NetForce injunction judgment. Back in mid 2020 the FTC was denied contempt sanctions, pending resolution of the FTC’s Success by Health pyramid scheme case. The FTC renewed its motion for contempt sanctions in June
FTC denied Netforce Seminars contempt sanctions Read More »
Resolution of several motions in the Success by Health case, have pushed the FTC’s claims against the Individual Defendants to the forefront. A hearing was held on February 17th, following which we’ve had some important decisions come in. The motions ruled on are complex, with the issues behind them becoming increasingly intertwined. This was evident
Success by Health trial narrowed to Individual Defendants Read More »
The Success By Health defendants have voluntarily withdrawn their injunction appeal. No reason for the withdrawal was given, with the case docket only recording withdrawal was granted on December 14th. Jay Noland and the rest of the Success By Health defendants filed their Ninth Circuit appeal on October 6th. The appeal sought to overturn a
Success By Health defendants withdraw injunction appeal Read More »
The FTC v. Success by Health trial is likely to be delayed. Jay Noland and his fellow defendants are not ready for trial. At time of publication the Success by Health defendants have not filed a notice indicating their readiness for a Final Pretrial Conference. On November 30th one of the Success by Health defendant’s
FTC v. Success by Health trial likely to be delayed Read More »
The FTC has been denied summary judgment on monetary remedies against Success by Health. Back in September, the FTC was granted liability summary judgment. This judgment ruled that, among other things, Success by Health violated the FTC’s Merchandise and Cooling-Off Rules by failing to offer customers the ability to consent to a delay in shipping
FTC denied SBH summary judgment on monetary remedies Read More »
Success by Health’s bid to overturn summary judgment via a motion for reconsideration has been denied. The FTC was granted liability summary judgment against Success by Health in September. In their motion for reconsideration, the SBH defendants focused their attention on VOZ Travel. The FTC maintains VOZ Travel was a pyramid scheme because it had
Success by Health denied summary judgment reconsideration Read More »
Success by Health and Jay Noland are set to appeal three orders against them; the original preliminary injunction order, and the FTC’s granted motion for sanctions and summary judgment. SBH’s second preliminary injunction appeal stems from a late September order, which in turn stemmed from denial of SBH’s first injunction appeal. That injunction pertained to
SBH to appeal prelim inj., sanctions & sum judgment orders Read More »
