Traffic Monsoon

Traffic Monsoon Receiver renews Canadian clawback efforts

Back in October 2019 the Traffic Monsoon Receiver sought to employ local attorneys to go after Canadian net-winners. The motion was denied later the same month. In denying the motion, the court recommended the Receiver ‘solicit multiple bids from attorneys experienced in this area of Canadian law’. On April 26th the Receiver filed a new […]

Traffic Monsoon Receiver renews Canadian clawback efforts Read More »

5 new motions for default in Traffic Monsoon clawback suit

The Traffic Monsoon Receiver has filed five new motions for default judgment. Traffic Monsoon net-winners targeted in the motions are Sharon James, Adil Khan, Limited By Invitation (company), Javediqbal Naeem and Mohammed Yasin. Amounts sought through default judgment are close to the amounts quoted in the original clawback complaint. Sharon James for example was initially

5 new motions for default in Traffic Monsoon clawback suit Read More »

Ernie Ganz & David Barker def judgments granted ($953K)

The Traffic Monsoon Receivership has secured default judgments against promoters Ernest “Ernie” Ganz and David Barker. Together, the pair of scammers are up for $953,195. With respect to Ernie Ganz (right), the court accepted as fact that he stole $448,051 from Traffic Monsoon victims. Ganz has failed to appear, plead, or file an answer in

Ernie Ganz & David Barker def judgments granted ($953K) Read More »

Traffic Monsoon “victim” claims $99 trillion dollars

The Traffic Monsoon Receiver has published her first claims report. Detailing where the claims process is at, the Receiver reveals that one Traffic Monsoon “victim” tried to claim $99 trillion dollars. I can’t say for sure but it seems pretty obvious whoever claimed $99 trillion was attempting to undermine the victim claims process. If I

Traffic Monsoon “victim” claims $99 trillion dollars Read More »

Scoville denied use of victim funds to pay legal fees (again)

Last August Charles Scoville filed a motion requesting Traffic Monsoon victims pay his $270,000+ legal bill. On May 29th Scoville’s motion was denied. As stated simply by the court: A defendant in a securities fraud lawsuit does not have a constitutional right to use frozen assets to pay for an attorney. The District Court acknowledged

Scoville denied use of victim funds to pay legal fees (again) Read More »