Why OneCoin’s Konstantin Ignatov travelled to the US


Was it ignorance, a false sense of safety, stupidity, or a case of all three?

There was quite a lot of hypothesis why Konstantin Ignatov, then CEO of OneCoin, travelled to the US in March 2019.

The sick fated journey culminated in Ignatov’s arrest at Los Angeles Worldwide Airport.

Immediately BehindMLM can reveal Ignatov confidentally travelled to the US, below the pretense OneCoin and the DealShaker expo he attended was authorized.

Ignatov’s false sense of safety was rooted in a authorized opinion obtained by Denis R. Murdock.

Denis Murdock was one in all OneCoin’s most distinguished promoters within the US.

After Ignatov’s arrest and the unsealing of associated indictments, Murdock (proper) did a full 180 on OneCoin.

Immediately Murdock could be discovered shilling “Cell Digital Physique Scanner Analyzers” via his firm Empower World Group.

Getting again to the authorized opinion; I’ve needed to redact the issuing lawyer as a situation of publication.

BehindMLM understands the lawyer in query is a part of the US’ ongoing OneCoin legal investigation.

The primary purple flag within the authorized opinion could be discovered within the quoted opening paragraph above.

The authorized opinion was framed as an examination of the “legality of internet hosting (the) Expo”.

DealShaker was added to OneCoin as pseudo-compliance. The Ponzi scheme was taking off and so they wanted the looks of a professional use-case.

And so DealShaker was launched, a barely functioning ecommerce platform that, at the very least partially, accepted onecoin tokens.

For essentially the most half DealShaker was populated with low-cost dropshipped items from China.

Notably gullible OneCoin traders have been lured into shopping for luxurious vehicles from Europe that by no means eventuated.

To create the phantasm of legitimacy, OneCoin held DealShaker expos all over the world.

In 2019, Denis Murdock was organizing one such expo on US soil.

The primary clarification made within the authorized opinion is that “The Expo as Anticipated is Authorized Beneath U.S. Federal Regulation”.

That is primarily based on the flawed premise that Ponzi schemes operated by way of cryptocurrency are authorized.

The Expo as Anticipated is Authorized Beneath U.S. Federal Regulation.

As Bitcoin and different cryptocurrencies turn out to be increasingly more mainstream, legislation enforcement businesses, tax authorities and authorized regulators everywhere in the world are attempting to wrap their heads across the idea of cryptocurrency, and the way precisely it ought to suit into current rules and authorized frameworks.

In line with the U.S. Treasury Division’s Monetary Crimes Enforcement Community (FINCEN), as of 2013, accepting Bitcoin or different cryptocurrencies as fee for well-natured items and companies is authorized.

Bitcoin specifically has been categorised within the U.S. as a convertible decentralized digital forex, and FINCEN has affirmatively acknowledged that those that acquire items of digital forex for the sale of products or companies will not be thought of cash transmitters, will not be required to register and are working throughout the bounds of federal legislation.

Bitcoin is now an accepted type of fee on a number of main and minor on-line marketplaces, in addition to at many main nationwide service suppliers, together with Overstock, Shopify and OKCupid.

Furthermore, there are outlets and eating places everywhere in the U.S. the place one will pay with Bitcoin.

In brief, retailers accepting OneCoin on the proposed Expo shall be working legally below U.S. federal legislation and below established precedent set by Bitcoin and different cryptocurrencies.

It is a frequent strawman argument raised by proponents of MLM cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes.

When confronted with analysis figuring out an organization as a Ponzi scheme, strawman arguments raised embrace “cryptocurrency isn’t regulated”, “cryptocurrency isn’t a safety”, or a close to sufficient by-product.

These arguments, because the authorized opinion aboe does, fully sidestep the urgent difficulty: Operating a Ponzi scheme is unlawful regardless of the medium used.

A Ponzi scheme could be run via fiat, cryptocurrency, Disney {Dollars} – it doesn’t matter. It’s nonetheless an unlawful Ponzi scheme.

What makes a Ponzi scheme so is the acceptance of funding (outlined as an “funding contract” as per the Howey Take a look at), and use of that funding to pay earlier traders.

With respect to an MLM Ponzi scheme, this eventuates by the use of funding used to pay withdrawals by earlier traders.

This may be masked behind varied ruses, e.g. DealShaker, a “buying and selling bot” and so on.

Alternatively you might have your bare-bones Ponzi schemes that don’t hassle. Or in the event that they do it’s low effort terminology pseudo-compliance.

One instance that involves thoughts is “staking”, as a catch-all to keep away from use of Ponzi terminology.

With that time made, the remainder of Mudock’s authorized opinion falls aside. It’s primarily based on the false premise that OneCoin is one way or the other a professional $4 billion greenback Ponzi scheme.

The Expo as Anticipated is Authorized Beneath Nevada State Regulation.

The overwhelming majority of the Sates in america haven’t handed any particular legal guidelines relating to the utilization of cryptocurrency.

Nonetheless, some States have taken affirmative steps to embrace blockchain expertise, whereas others have made strikes to discourage residents from participating with cryptocurrency.

Nevada falls into the previous class, and is usually seen as a State very pleasant to cryptocurrency.

In truth, on June 5, 2017, the Nevada State Legislature grew to become the primary US state to approve a invoice which is able to block native authorities entities from taxing blockchain transactions.

Bitcoin is accepted frequently by retailers of all kinds throughout the State of Nevada, and there may be nothing unlawful about retailers accepting fee by way of OneCoin on the proposed Expo below Nevada Regulation.

In conclusion, it’s my authorized opinion that below each Federal U.S. Regulation and Nevada State Regulation, retailers can legally settle for funds in OneCoin on the Expo.

Please don’t hesitate to contact me should you require any additional elucidation on this matter.

OneCoin’s regulatory difficulty was by no means whether or not cryptocurrency was unlawful, or whether or not retailers might legally settle for OneCoin on the DealShaker expo occasion. It was, and at all times has been, OneCoin being a multi-billion greenback Ponzi scheme.

That’s what your entire US OneCoin legal case is predicated on.

With OneCoin recognized as a Ponzi scheme, any and all enterprise operations hooked up to OneCoin are thus rooted in fraud.

Nonetheless, primarily based on authorized representations, Ignatov travelled to the US to attend Murdock’s Las Vegas DealShaker Expo.

Regardless of his arrest nearly three years in the past, Konstantin Ignatov’s legal case continues to be enjoying out.

BehindMLM continues to trace the standing of all recognized US OneCoin associated legal actions.