The Success By Well being defendants have voluntarily withdrawn their injunction attraction.
No motive for the withdrawal was given, with the case docket solely recording withdrawal was granted on December 14th.
Jay Noland and the remainder of the Success By Well being defendants filed their Ninth Circuit attraction on October sixth.
The attraction sought to overturn a September twenty third order, denying the defendant’s’ movement to dissolve the granted preliminary injunction.
Wanting ahead, the events are in disagreement with respect to scheduling.
Amongst different issues, Noland the SBH defendants argue the FTC has not complied with numerous FRCP guidelines. Thus a delay in scheduling a trial just isn’t warranted.
The FTC filed its response on December twenty second, dismissing the SBH defendant’s arguments as “a seize bag of points unrelated to trial scheduling”.
A call on the scheduling dispute stays pending.