A call on whether or not Jason and Eunjung Cardiff are in contempt stays pending, however within the meantime a number of different movement choices have gone towards them.
The Cardiffs had challenged a preliminary injunction granted towards them in 2018.
The injunction was granted as a part of the FTC’s client fraud case towards them.
Based on the Cardiff’s, they’d discontinued gross sales to shoppers previous to the FTC’s grievance. Thus the granted preliminary injunction ought to be dissolved, permitting them to proceed as producers.
The FTC basically argues the declare Redwood Scientific Applied sciences had ceased promoting to shoppers is a lie.
In deciding the matter, the court docket dominated that whether or not the Redwood had or hadn’t stopped promoting to shoppers was
related as to whether the PI ought to have issued within the first place, not whether or not the PI ought to now be dissolved.
The court docket additionally said the Cardiffs’ claims with respect to not doing enterprise had been “not credible”.
Not withstanding if the Cardiffs weren’t mendacity, the court docket present in any occasion there was
sufficient proof exists to fulfill the usual of a chance of recurrence.
Even when Defendants had stopped enterprise operations previous to the submitting of the Criticism, the presence of merchandise, delivery packing containers, labels, and receipt of an order demonstrates that Defendants had been more likely to have interaction in future enterprise operations.
Numerous different minor arguments by the Cardiffs had been additionally rejected.
Subsequently, the Cardiff’s movement to dissolve the preliminary injunction was denied on March tenth.
One other March tenth order permitted the Receiver’s request to promote the Cardiff’s Upland, California household residence.
Individually, on March ninth the court docket scheduled the Cardiff’s Redwood trial for July 14th.
A call on the FTC’s present trigger contempt movement stays pending, keep tuned…