Injunction sought against Dustin Sparman & Vantage Payments


The TelexFree class-action plaintiffs are searching for a preliminary injunction in opposition to Dustin Sparman and Vantage Funds.

The TelexFree class-action plaintiffs allege Sparman and Vantage Funds ‘performed an instrumental function’ within the operation of TelexFree.

Sparman obtained important positive aspects by his curiosity in Vantage Funds, LLC, which characterised itself as an “impartial gross sales agent” and procured fee processing companies for TelexFree.

Plaintiffs search compensation for financial loss sustained on account of Sparman and Vantage Fee, LLC’s conduct in aiding and abetting the TelexFree scheme.

The category-action plaintiffs put forth that Sparman (proper) and Vantage Funds

have already transferred the property of Vantage Funds, LLC to a different fee processing firm in the course of the pendency of this litigation have already.

Defendants have already acted to switch away the property of Vantage Funds, LLC, Plaintiffs concern that mentioned Defendants will additional dissipate property by varied means, together with transferring funds to banks in international nations, except the aid sought is granted.

Sparman and Vantage Funds signed on as TelexFree’s fee processor, following the withdrawal of World Payroll Gateway and Base Commerce in 2013.

The category-action plaintiffs put forth that Sparman and Vantage Funds had full information of TelexFree operating a Ponzi scheme.

Sparman and Vantage Funds had been initially related with TelexFree by (Base Commerce’s) John Hughes in or about August 2013, after Base Commerce had determined to terminate TelexFree’s account as a consequence of suspicious exercise and a excessive chargeback fee.

As a way to extricate Base Commerce from the scheme with out inflicting incoming funds to instantly stop (thereby inflicting the scheme to instantly collapse), Hughes enlisted Sparman and Vantage Funds to find a brand new fee processor for TelexFree.

After being knowledgeable of TelexFree by Hughes, Sparman and Vantage Funds proceeded with their required underwriting due diligence on TelexFree. Throughout this course of, Hughes and Amirie mentioned their issues relating to TelexFree’s illegality with Sparman.

In a single electronic mail despatched to Hughes in August 2013, Sparman wrote;

there’s fairly a little bit of unfavorable press across the Brazil state of affairs.

Would they be prepared to signal a doc stating that they aren’t at present below investigation with any federal organizations?

This service provider is at present below investigation in Brazil for being a Ponzi scheme.

Have they got something to say concerning the present standing of those issues. It’s a extremely unfavorable factor that they’re promoting a lot much less product than they’re promoting the chance to promote product.

[includes links to five online articles accusing TelexFree of being a Ponzi scheme]

Seeing as TelexFree was more and more discovering it troublesome to take care of banking channels, the class-action plaintiffs put forth “Sparman’s help was essential”.

Along with fee processing companies, Sparman and Vantage Funds

  • offered TelexFree with a buyer dispute decision community service (used to take care of a excessive degree of chargebacks)
  • arrange TelexFree LTD, a shell firm arrange within the UK with a false tackle, used to try to safe offshore banking (two makes an attempt failed)
  • managed TelexFree’s relationship with Allied Pockets, together with negotiation of “extra favorable processing phrases”

Stunningly, regardless of the illegality of the TelexFree scheme, Sparman remained concerned with the scheme till its chapter submitting in April 2014.

TelexFree saved Sparman concerned with guarantees of accelerating riches, with Merrill telling Sparman on January 17, 2014, within the midst of ongoing regulatory investigations:

If we’re doing limitless transactions there can be loads of enterprise to go round.

You deserve your share for getting us began and Tom [proposed Defendant Thomas Wells] deserves his share for getting us what we wanted.

Whomever treats us greatest will get a lot of the enterprise. I do know it will work out. Look ahead to persevering with to work with you.

The category-action plaintiffs allege Sparman and Vantage Funds assisted TelexFree with processing $86.9 million in stolen investor funds.

In preparation for submitting their lawsuit, the class-action plaintiffs learnt

In 2018 Sparman entered into an Asset Buy Settlement with one other fee processing firm, the Canada-based Nuvei, Inc., for the sale of Vantage Funds, LLC’s property.

Plaintiffs first realized of this sale of Vantage Funds’ property in 2020 by impartial analysis; neither Vantage Funds nor Sparman disclosed the existence of this asset switch to Plaintiffs or to the Courtroom.

When Plaintiffs’ counsel requested counsel for Sparman and Vantage Funds about this sale, Defendants’ counsel refused to debate it.

Given the truth that the financial damages brought on by Sparman and Vantage Funds’ actions for TelexFree exceed $100 million, Plaintiffs are involved that mentioned Defendants will absolutely dissipate their property previous to issuance of judgment

On LinkedIn Sparman cites two government roles at Nuvei;

  1. Senior Vice President of Nuvei’s Strategic Accounts Group (Jul 2019 – Jun 2020)
  2. Vice President of Gross sales of Nuvei’s Stategic Accounts Program (Nov 2018 – Jun 2020)

Sparman seems to have left Vantage Funds in 2018. The corporate’s web site continues to be up however is returning an SSL certificates safety error.

Since 2013 Sparman has served as a Managing Companion and CEO of Clear Service provider Companies.

If a preliminary injunction is granted in opposition to Sparman and Vantage Funds, their property can be frozen, no matter the place they wound up.

The courtroom held a listening to on preliminary injunction movement on April sixth. The matter was taken below advisement.

Pending a ruling on the movement, keep tuned.

 

Replace thirtieth April 2021 – An April twenty first order has denied class motion Plaintiff’s movement for an injunction.