In a scrumptious twist of irony, a courtroom in crime infested Dubai not too long ago heard a case introduced by a OneCoin sufferer.
In response to the courtroom submitting, the sufferer plaintiff was bought 40,000 OneCoin Ponzi tokens for AED 100,000 (~27,225 USD).
Upon receiving the funds, the recruited scammer then didn’t switch the OneCoin tokens over.
This prompted the sufferer to file a lawsuit within the Main Courtroom of Ras Al-Khaimah.
The Main Courtroom dominated in favor of the OneCoin sufferer, ordering the recruiting scammer to return the invested quantity plus AED 10,000 in compensation (~$2,722 USD).
This prompted an enchantment, as reported by Lexology;
The Vendor appealed the Main Courtroom judgment earlier than the Appeals Courtroom arguing that the sale is legitimate because it was carried out by a “Deal Shaker” platform, and it doesn’t violate the regulation nor public coverage.
The scammer tried to argue that the phrases the OneCoin tokens have been bought below meant
the Vendor would preserve the cryptocurrency in accordance with the Vendor’s phrases and situations as listed on-line and launch it for switch to the Purchaser between sure durations of time.
The Appeals Courtroom rejected the scammer’s argument, discovering OneCoin to be a Ponzi scheme.
The Courtroom discovered that OneCoin (and its associated firms and its founder Ruja Ignatova), as being the article of the underlying settlement, was deemed related to fraud that tempts buyers to hitch a Ponzi scheme.
The Courtroom concluded that the bought forex and its circulation constitutes fraud, which makes it an invalid transaction and a violation of regulation and public coverage.
If solely Dubai’s authorities have been on the identical stage as their courts.