The Isagenix Amazon retail racket receipts


Final week we reported on a lawsuit alleging Isagenix company have been in on a secret Amazon/eBay retail racket.

A number of days after information of the lawsuit broke, Isagenix co-founder Jim Coover appeared on a management name to deny the allegations.

At present we look at proof that means in any other case.

Earlier than we get began, the events you’ll see within the screenshots beneath are as follows:

  • Bryan Lund – Co-Plaintiff and within the screenshots something on the correct
  • Scott Christensen – Co-Plaintiff with Lund
  • Jay Bennett – Isagenix’s third high earner when Lund was recruited, then rose to high earner inside the firm
  • Isagenix company – specifically Isagenix’s Compliance Division
  • Jennifer Rodriguez – a part of Bennett’s rapid downline and introduces herself as “Jay’s assistant”

As per Lund’s and Christensen’s grievance, Lund joined Isagenix on the proviso Isagenix company was on board.

This started in October 2017:

As detailed within the grievance, the primary try at promoting Isagenix on Amazon and eBay got here to an abrupt halt a number of months later.

At Bennett’s insistence, and illustration he’d smoothed issues over with Isagenix company, the unique plan was restarted in early 2019 (across the date of Jennifer Rodriguez reaching out above).

In introducing herself, Rodriguez prompt considered one of her obligations was ensuring Bennett’s downline maintained product orders.

This was performed to make sure Bennett continued to qualify for commissions:

The Amazon racket ruse noticed Rodriguez, on behalf of Bennett, create a bunch of buyer and distributor accounts to order product by way of:

E mail addresses and telephone numbers used to generate these accounts seem to have been created on demand:

The names of the accounts, a minimum of partly seem like actual folks. To that finish contracts have been drawn up governing who received paid what:

As per the phrases of the confidential agreements, patsies allowed Bennett to make use of their created Isagenix accounts to push Amazon racket product by way of.

In change, Bennett paid them a non-refundable preliminary cost of $25,000. One other $25,000 was paid when the account was promoted to Govt.

The phrases of the contracts have been for eleven months. At some stage in the contract, Bennett was then accountable for paying Lund weekly Isagenix checks.

Initially, particular person supply addresses have been used to ship Isaganix merchandise ordered by way of these accounts to. Lund then organized assortment of the product.

Utilizing this methodology, 1000’s of {dollars} have been spent ordering Isagenix merchandise:

VISA present playing cards have been used to buy the product. The suspicious nature of the transactions was typically sufficient to set off VISA’s in home safety:

At one level Lund joked about promoting a Ferrari to proceed funding the racket:

Choosing up 1000’s of {dollars} in orders from a number of addresses proved cumbersome.  Finally Lund got here to the conclusion that, if he was to proceed, it was be on the proviso one tackle could be used.

Bennett smoothed the request over with company, leading to racket orders being despatched to the identical Utah tackle (click on to enlarge):

Bennett additionally smoothed over the necessity for present playing cards, permitting Rodriguez to order merchandise throughout a number of accounts by way of one bank card.

Lund claims this went on for seven months, and that he has 1000’s of same-address invoices.

It’s necessary to notice that this isn’t doable with out an override on Isagenix’s finish.

That brings us to communication between Bennett and Isagenix company, which started as early as October 2017:

Observe that the above instance is from the primary failed Amazon racket try. Bennett nevertheless continued to clean issues over with Isagenix compliance the second time round:

For causes unknown, on or round August 2019 Isagenix’s Compliance Division wished out of no matter association Bennett had going.

This prompted an August twenty eighth e mail to Scott Christensen, who labored with Lund, from Kymberly Valenzuela, Director of Isagenix World Compliance.

The e-mail pertained to verifying particulars of the bogus accounts Jennifer Rodriguez had arrange for the racket.

As you already know, we now have labored with you extensively over the previous couple of months to deliver the accounts inside compliance.

As well as, we’d like your assurance that the merchandise aren’t ending up on Amazon or comparable websites.

If we do turn out to be conscious of merchandise being offered on such websites, we are going to terminate the related accounts.

After Friday August thirtieth, Isagenix will likely be eradicating duplicate bank cards from all accounts aside from the person account holder and will likely be blocking entry to accounts we’re not capable of confidently validate within the method indicated above.

Jay Bennett was CC’d in on the e-mail. In a followup September sixth e mail to Lund, Bennett acknowledged;

the corporate is shutting your positions down – it’s out of my management – wished you to get readability on compliance path – ( learn beneath ). Jb

Past that, Lund couldn’t get a solution as to what went fallacious.

Regardless of the proof supplied above, Jim Coover maintains “there is no such thing as a reality” to Lund’s and Christensen’s allegations.

Isagenix has by no means actively promoted merchandise on Amazon or inspired others to do the identical.

The validity of Coover’s assertion above is thrown into query by an Amazon vendor response from iServe.

In response to a question on how they have been getting away with promoting Isagenix merchandise on Amazon, iServe acknowledged they have been “a licensed vendor partnering instantly with Isagenix”.

That was July 2019, throughout the time Bennett’s personal Isagenix Amazon racket was working.

iServe stating they have been partnered instantly with Isagenix suggests an settlement with company.

iServe is an Utah primarily based Amazon vendor with 42,834 scores.

The corporate’s tackle is shared with Sample, who declare to be a

main participant in ecommerce intelligence, gross sales optimization, market administration, and world growth.

If Isagenix had an settlement with iServe, it seems they now not do. Though they clearly as soon as have been, on the time of publication iServe aren’t promoting any Isagenix stock on Amazon.

Isagenix dismantling Jay Bennett’s Amazon racket noticed Lund and Christensen terminated as distributors.

Bennett, a person defendant within the lawsuit, continues to be a high earner inside Isagenix. To the very best of my data neither Bennett or Rodriguez have been reprimanded for his or her conduct.

How widespread the follow of making and managing bogus buyer/distributor accounts is inside Isagenix’s high earners in unclear.

One of many allegations raised in Lund’s and Christensen’s lawsuit is that Bennett instructed them

the highest 10 Isagenix distributors had been permitted for web resale so long as they didn’t permit different distributors to bear in mind and “stored it below the radar”.

Jim Coover has acknowledged Isagenix intends to file a movement to dismiss the filed grievance.